Is it possible to achieve high quality metadata at the institutional level? A new ambitious METADATA 2020 initiative's belief is that investing in richer metadata should be the scholarly community’s top priority.
Metadata is data about data, information about information ...
Good, satisfactory, open, connected and re-usable metadata reduces mis-communication and mis-interpretation, fuels discovery and innovation, bridges the gaps between systems and communities, and eliminates duplication of effort.
Although metadata is considered to be one of the most powerful tools available in support of scholarly communication, different organisations are still standing in front of several problems related to receiving unsatisfactory or inadequate metadata from publishers which should be delivered to the different authorized institutional repositories.
To create awareness and resources for all who have a stake in creating and using scholarly metadata, in September 2017 METADATA 2020 was launched.
METADATA 2020 will demonstrate why richer metadata should be the scholarly community’s top priority, how we can all evaluate ourselves and improve, and what can be achieved when we work harder, and work together. To that end :
METADATA 20202 will be offering many opportunities for GETTING INVOLVED involved: workshopping, listening, creating, evaluating, and developing. Let Metadata2020.org know how you can help.
E-mail : email@example.com to stay in touch and get involved.
"Having input, and feedback from all parts of the research ecosystem will be critical to Metadata 2020’s success, and participation is open to all", - the Scholarly Kitchen.
Follow @Metadata2020 on Twitter.
Although Metadata research has not kept pace with other Data Science topics, there is little attention directed to this problem. This is surprising, given that metadata is essential for data science endeavors”, - Big Metadata, Smart Metadata, and Metadata Capital: Toward Greater Synergy Between Data Science and Metadata (Jane Greenberg, De Gruyter,Open Access Online: 2017-08-22)
- A new Metadata Application Profile for Literature Repositories is approaching (OpenAIRE blog)
- NISO’s 2017 primer : Understanding Metadata
- Metadata as Standard: improving Interoperability through the Research Data Alliance (Recorded Webinar@AIMS)
Building a Common Infrastructure: The Challenges of Modern Metadata (Recorded Webinar, Society for Scholarly Publishing / SSP)
Will Richer Metadata Rescue Research? (Recorded Webinar, SSP)
Metadata Management: Essential Tips for Publishers (Recorded Webinars, SSP)
Metadata and copyright: an unexplored territory (by Stefano Nanni, LinkedIn)
- How to select appropriate encoding strategies for producing Linked Open Data (LOD)-enabled bibliographic data (AIMS)
- Assigning METADATA as method to support DIGITAL DATA CURATION in trusted repositories (AIMS)
- NISO Publishes Recommended Practice on Metadata Indicators for Accessibility and Licensing of E-Content
- COAR Strategy for Metadata Harmonization
- NISO TR-06-2017: Issues in Vocabulary Management. AGROVOC thesaurus in "Vocabulary Preservation" Section