Open Access: Self-archiving

26/07/2013

Self-archiving means to deposit a digital document in a publicly accessible website, preferable an OAI compliant repository [1]. Self-archiving further refers to self-archiving of peer-reviewed research journal and conference articles, as well as thesis, books, and book chapters. Usually, authors deposit in their institutional repository or open archive with a goal of making their work visible, accessible, harvestable and usable.

Besides exposing and facilitating access to research online, self-archiving maximizes the visibility,usage and impact the research outputs.In the agricultural domain, CIARD conducted a study on researchers' attitude towards openness to research output.

Some aspects of Self-archiving

In order to understand the concept of self-archiving the following aspects are worth mentioning:

a) Pre-prints and Post-prints

In general, a pre-print is the version the author submits for peer-review. However, the pre-print definition has also been extended to mean the finished article, reviewed and amended, ready and accepted for publication - but separate from the version that is type-set or formatted by the publisher. Once the article has been reviewed and the author has made any corresponding revisions, it becomes the post-print version. For a detailed discussion of these terms kindly read [2] and [4], further items to consider include:

  • articles deposited in a repository should be peer-reviewed articles.
  • which version (either pre-print or post-print) is deposited in a repository depends much on the publisher’s policies. Read for example one publisher policy here, or check the directory of publisher policies here.
  • Find here a selected list of publishers who have no restrictions to self-archiving.
  • If you intend to publish,it is advised to check what your institutional policy says on pre-print or post print before signing any copyright clearance with any publisher. 

b) Three main places to self-archive

  • In an institutional repository
  • In a subject/central repository
  • On a personal website

c) Self-archiving is not publication

In scholarly communication, articles meeting the quality standards of peer review, and thereafter accepted for publication by a peer-reviewed journal, counts as publication. Self-archiving therefore is not publication, but deposits of peer-reviewed articles in a repository.

What can stakeholders do to facilitate self-archiving?

  1. Authors/ Researchers 
  • deposit your peer-reviewed pre-print articles in a repository (preferably your institutional repository)
  • Read your copyright agreement from your publisher and check the possibility of self-archiving.
  • Publish in an open access journal and deposit your article for archiving.

 2.  Research institutions

  • Have an OAI-Compliant Open repository,
  • Institutional open access mandate supporting self-archiving,
  • Declare support to Openness, for example subscribing to the CIARD Manifesto,
  • Recognize authors who self-archive or publish on open access.
 3.  Research funders
 
  • Mandate that research that you support should be publicly available.
  • Make mandatory open-archiving part of measures to support openness on all work you fund.
  • Make it part of grant applications that CVs and bibliographies citing the applicant's prior work should contain links to the online full-text.

References and further reading [This blog relied on the following references]

  1. Suber Peter (2012) Open Access. MIT Press.
  2. Self-archiving:the Green route to Open Access.
  3. Self-archiving:Frequently asked Questions.
  4. Preprints and Post Prints.

انضم إلينا

عندما تصبح عضوًا في بوابة معايير إدارة المعلومات الزراعية، يمكنك المساهمة في المناقشات وتلقي التحديثات الدورية عبر البريد الإلكتروني والرسالة الإخبارية للبوابة.

التسجيل