While checking the content in the WB after conversion I found the following inconsistencies which need to be considered before June release. The following issues I would like to share with all.

Issue 1:

In All the Alternative Descriptors are shown as non preferred terms (please find the attachment) in order to be represented as RT relations as in AGROVOC database ( we have converted the significant common name to RT and refined them with “sameAs/ correspondsTo” relationship.

Issue 2

If the Alternative Descriptors is having any Used For (UF) relations it is reflected in the workbench even though they are existing in AGROVOC database ( Please find the screenshot of (Silver fir).

Issue 3

In the workbench the refinement between Common names and Scientific names is not properly carried (find attachment). They have to be represented in the following way.

                                       “sameAs(isScientificNameOf) “

                                                “correspondsTo(hasScientificName)"